Environmental impact analysis based on sustainable behavior, sources and uses of energy.

Authors

  • Virginia Guadalupe López Torres Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
  • Luis Ramón Moreno Moreno Profesor-Investigador
  • Carmen Patricia Jiménez Terrazas Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez
  • Mariana Monserrat Valenzuela Montoya Universidad Autónoma de Baja California

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v22i2.1607

Keywords:

Sustainability, Energy consumption, rural communities, communal property, Geothermal.

Abstract

The study aims to explain the relationship between environmental impact from the variables of energy use priorities, sources of information on energy, relevant factors of life, and energy and sustainable behavior, based on the perception of ejidatarios and communal farmers of Ejido Cruz Colorada, located in the municipality of Chignahuapan, in the state of Puebla, Mexico. For that, a questionnaire was designed based on an on-site investigation, in which characteristics of ejidatarios and community members were identified with respect to age, level of education and tasks performed. The design of the items was based on a literature review and a reflexive design was used to measure the variables. The instrument was applied to 123 ejidatarios and community members, and the results obtained confirm the presence of convergent and discriminant validity of the latent variables. The relationships between these variables were tested using the partial least squares (PLS) model. The results indicated that the variables of energy use and energy information sources have a positive and significant effect on sustainable behavior, in addition, sustainable behavior has a negative and significant effect on the variable of environmental impact. Specifically, it is observed that energy information sources have a small effect (0.127) on energy behavior, while energy use has a moderate effect (0.210) on sustainable behavior; in turn, sustainable behavior has a large effect (0.337) on the environmental impact dimension. The constructs of sustainable behavior and information sources explain 35.5% of the variance of the endogenous construct called environmental impact.

References

Agatón G, Santiago A, Cruz-Guzmán V, de León-Chapa A, Sautto JM, Bouza C. 2022. Estima ción de impacto ambiental, económico y social en la región del Istmo de Tehuantepec debido a la instalación de parques eólicos. Investigación Operacional, 43(2). 176–191.

Amato MS, Shaw BR, Olson E, Turyk N, Genskow K, Moore CF. 2016. The challenge of motivated cognition in promoting lake health among shoreline property owners: biased estimation of personal environmental impact. Lake and Reservoir Management, 32(4). 386-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2016.1234010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2016.1234010

André H, González-Holguera J, Depoux A, Pasquier J, Haller DM, Rodondi PY, Schwarz J, Senn N. 2022. Talking about Climate Change and Environmental Degradation with Patients in Primary Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey on Knowledge, Potential Domains of Action and Points of View of General Practitioners. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084901

Chin W. 2010. How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses. In: Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Esposito VV, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H (eds), Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29. pp: 655-690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29

Contini M, Annunziata E, Rizzi F, Battaglia M, Daddi T, Frey M, Karytsas S, Dimitrio M, Sciullo A, Padovan C, Manzella A, Montalvo C, Poliakov E. 2020. Report on results, concepts and surveys for public engagement. GEMEX Project Filial report.

de la Garza MDJ, Pineda RXM. 2020. Televisoras y redes sociales en el contexto de una transformación en materia de consumo de información sobre asuntos de la vida pública: Percepciones de una nueva generación en México. Comunicação Mídia e Consumo, 17(49). 222–243. https://doi.org/10.18568/CMC.V17I49.2366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18568/cmc.v17i49.2366

Doell KC, Conte B, Brosch T. 2021. Interindividual differences in environmentally relevant positive trait affect impacts sustainable behavior in everyday life. Scientific Reports, 11(1). 20423. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99438-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99438-y

Fornell C, Larcker D. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18. 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

García GFB. 2017. Debate sobre la inclusión del cooperativismo dentro de las políticas de la Nueva Ruralidad en América Latina. Panorama Económico, 25(3). 357-380. https://doi.org/10.32997/2463-0470-vol.25-num.3-2017-2081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32997/2463-0470-vol.25-num.3-2017-2081

Gherheș V, Fărcașiu MA. 2021. Sustainable Behavior among Romanian Students: A Perspective on Electricity Consumption in Households. Sustainabi-lity, 13(9357). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169357

Goyas MR. 2019. Trasformaciones y dinámicas espaciales en un ejido del centro de Jalisco. Region y Sociedad, 31: e1007. https://doi.org/10.22198/rys2019/31/1007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22198/rys2019/31/1007

Hair J, Howard M, Nitzl C. 2020. Assessing measurement model quality in PLSSEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109. 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069

Hair J, Hult G, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. 2017. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.

Henseler J, Ringle C, Sinkovics R. 2009. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20. 277–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/ S1474-7979(2009)0000020014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014

Horne C, Huddart KE. 2019. Explaining support for renewable energy: commitments to selfsufficiency and communion. Environmental Politics, 28(5). 929–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1517917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1517917

Kennedy EH, Muzzerall P. 2022. Morality, Emotions, and the Ideal Environmentalist: Toward A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Political Polarization. American Behavioral Scientist, 66(9). 1263–1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642211056258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642211056258

Khansari N, Mostashari A, Mansouri M. 2014. Impact of information sharing on energy behavior: A system dynamics approach. 2014 IEEE International Systems Conference Proceedings, Systems Conference (SysCon), 2014 8th Annual IEEE, 255–258. https://doi.org/10.1109/SysCon.2014.6819266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SysCon.2014.6819266

Kuai P, Zhang X, Zhang S, Li J. 2022. Environmental awareness and household energy saving of Chinese residents: Unity of knowing and doing or easier said than done? Journal of Asian Economics, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2022.101534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2022.101534

Lopes M, Henggeler AC, Janda KB. 2019. Energy and behaviour: Challenges of a low-carbon future. In: Energy and Behaviour. Towards a Low Carbon Future. Lopes M., Henggeler AC, Janda KB, (eds). Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-01269-4. pp: 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818567-4.00030-2

Marin AJ. 2017. The professional press as a source of historiographical information in the History of Nursing. Culture of Care, 21(47). 69–82. https://doi.org/10.14198/cuid.2017.47.07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NURSE.0000525988.51732.ff

Martínez C, Poladian A. 2020. El uso de energía fotovoltaica en viviendas de Buenos Aires: Estudio microeconómico de factibilidad. Economía Coyuntural, Revista de Temas de Coyuntura y Perspectivas, 5(2). 33–58. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3924740.

Matuštík J, Kočí V. 2019. Environmental impact of personal consumption from life cycle perspective – A Czech Republic case study. Science of The Total Environment, 646. 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.233

Navarro O, Tapia-Fonllem C, Fraijo-Sing B, Roussiau N, Ortiz-Valdez A, Guillard M, Wittenberg I, Fleury-Bahi G. 2020. Connectedness to nature and its relationship with spirituality, wellbeing and sustainable behavior. PsyEcology, 11(1). 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2019.1643662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2019.1643662

Niamir L, Ivanova O, Filatova T, Voinov A, Bressers H. 2020. Demand-side solutions for climate mitigation: Bottom-up drivers of household energy behavior change in the Netherlands and Spain. Energy Research and Social Science, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101356

Niño JA, Gutiérrez GJ, Fernández FH. 2021. Recurso educativo digital para el uso racional de la energía eléctrica en comunidades rurales colombianas. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, XXVII (Número Especial 4). 410-425.

Olmedo NR. 2019. La renta de tierra en las zonas rurales de México: un estudio de caso sobre los efectos de la nueva ruralidad. Espacio Abierto: Cuaderno Venezolano de Sociologia, 28(2). 153-169.

Orduña ME, Martín MA, López CED. 2016. Researchgate as a source of scientific evaluation: unveiling its bibliometric applications. The information professional, 25(2). 303–310. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.mar.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.mar.18

Pasca L. 2022. Estimating one’s own environmental impact: others, acceptability and offsetting (Estimando el propio impacto ambiental: los demás, lo aceptable y lo compensable). PsyEcology, 13(2). 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2022.2034289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2022.2034289

Rincón C, Restrepo AL, Alzate MS, Zabala HE, Arboleda OL. 2021. Rural inequalities in Colombia: contributions for the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. Lasallian Research Journal, 18(2). 178–200. https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v18n2a13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v18n2a13

Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Mitchell R, Gudergan SP. 2020. Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12). 1617-1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655

Rodríguez MD, Hernández PT. 2018. Spanish Newspapers as a Source of Reference in Wikipedia. The Information Professional, 27(6). 1323–1333. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.15

Rodríguez TDR, Benavides PJA. 2016. Salud y ruralidad en Colombia: análisis desde los determinantes sociales de la salud. Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública, 34(3). 359–371. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v34n3a10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v34n3a10

Romo D, Valtierra E, González MJ, Valdez JR, Vivar R. 2016. Organización social ejidal y manejo del capital natural forestal maderable en Carbonero-Jacales, Huayacocotla, Veracruz. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 7(34). 85-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v7i34.85

Rubalcava CA, Zerón M. 2020. The social enterprise: Mexican context. SCIENCE ergo-sum, Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal of Foresight, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.30878/ces.v27n3a3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30878/ces.v27n3a3

Salazar NHF, Venegas MF. 2018. Impact of energy use and gross capital formation on economic growth. An analysis of panel data on 73 countries grouped by income level and oil production. The Economic Quarter, 85(338). 341–364. https://doi.org/10.20430/ete.v85i338.342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20430/ete.v85i338.342

Sánchez NJ, Aranda D. 2011. Internet as a source of information for the daily life of Spanish youth. The Information Professional, 20(1). 32–37. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2011.jan.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2011.ene.04

Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Smith D, Reams R, Hair Jr JF. 2014. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1). 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002

Seidel G, Back A. 2009. Success Factor Validation for Global ERP Programmes. European Conference on Information Systems. Verona, Italy 8.‐10.06.2009.

Severo EA, Lima ET, Anjos JS, Almeida SM, Santos SR, Albuquerque PP. 2021. The relationships between eco-innovation, sustainable awareness, environmental strategy, organizational performance and environmental impact in the Northeast of Brazil. Ibero-American Journal of Strategy (RIAE), 20(1). 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v20i1.18380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v20i1.18380

Steg L, Perlaviciute G, van der Werff E. 2015. Understanding the human dimensions of a sustainable energy transition. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi.10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00805

Tapia C, Corral-Verdugo V, Fraijo-Sing B, Duron F. 2013. Assessing Sustainable Behavior and its Correlates: A Measure of Pro-Ecological, Frugal, Altruistic and Equitable Actions. Sustainability, 5(2). 711-723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020711

Tonello GL, Valladares N. 2015. Conciencia ambiental y conducta sustentable relacionada con el uso de energía para iluminación. Gestión y Ambiente, 18(1). 45–59.

Valero DE, Escribano J, Pérez-Cosín JV. 2022. Perceptions of Social Exclusion in Rural Areas During the Great Recession: A Tale of Neoliberalism, Patriarchy, and Rural Idyll Frames. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 179. 125-144. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.179.125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.179.125

Verachtert S. 2022. The effects of attitudes on household energy behavior. A study of climate change concern, responsibility, and awareness in European societies. Social Science Quarterly, 103(5). 1221-1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13183

Zacarias EFJ, Higuchi MIG. 2017. Relação pessoa-ambiente: caminhos para uma vida sustentável. (Portuguese). Interacoes, 18(3). 121–129. https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v18i3.1431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v18i3.1431

Published

2025-03-20

How to Cite

López Torres, V. G., Moreno Moreno, L. R., Jiménez Terrazas, C. P., & Valenzuela Montoya, M. M. (2025). Environmental impact analysis based on sustainable behavior, sources and uses of energy. Agricultura, Sociedad Y Desarrollo, 22(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v22i2.1607