Conflict resolution inside water users’ organizations in Chile: judicialization or arbitration?

Authors

  • Diego Castro-Portales Universidad de Talca, Chile
  • María P. Moraga-Navarro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v12i3.233

Abstract

The alternatives or pathways currently used for conflict resolution, that is to say judicialization or arbitration, would apparently not be the only existing paths for the resolution of transcendent controversies for users of river courses. In effect, on the one side we believe that we will not obtain anything productive if the legislator continues to add new procedures, both for arbitration and for judicial processes proper. This is because if these new procedures are used daily, they do not fulfill the expected goals. To address and solve the situation set out, we believe it to be completely feasible that Vigilance Boards can firstly solve, as they currently do, the conflicts that arise throughout their territory, using the Board as arbitrator arbiter.

References

Correa Selamé, Jorge. 2006. Curso de Derecho Procesal, Tomo II, Ediciones Jurídicas de Santiago, Chile. 72 p.

Guzmán Alcalde, Alberto, y Ernesto Ravera Herrera. 2007. Estudio de las Aguas. 2° Edición, Editorial Jurídica. Santiago, Chile. 203-204.

Muñoz Escudero, Gonzalo. 2011. El procedimiento judicial en materia de aguas. In: Vergara Blanco, Alejandro (coord) Código de Aguas comentado, Doctrina y Jurisprudencia, Abeledo Perrot, Legal Publishing. Chile. pp: 803-806.

Muñoz Escudero, Gonzalo. 2011. El amparo Judicial. In: Vergara Blanco, Alejandro (coord). Código de Aguas comentado, Doctrina y Jurisprudencia. Abeledo Perrot, Legal Publishing Chile. pp: 813-825.

Obando Camino, Iván Mauricio. 2006. El arbitraje voluntario

del nuevo artículo 185 bis del Código de Aguas legislando

conforme al más bajo común denominador. In: Revista de

Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso,

XXVII, 2° Semestre. Chile. pp: 269-287.

Rojas Calderón, Christian. 2002. El Arbitraje previo en las Asociaciones de Canalistas. In: Revista de Derecho Administrativo Económico, Vol. IV, N° 1, Santiago, Chile, pp. 137-142.

Romero Seguel, Alejandro. 2001. Conceptos procesales fundamentales en la aplicación judicial del Derecho de Aguas. In: Revista de Derecho Administrativo Económico de Recursos Naturales, Vol. III, N° 2, Santiago, Chile. pp: 617-631.

Segura Riveiro, Francisco. 2006. Derecho de Aguas. Lexis Nexis, 2° Edición, Santiago, Chile. Vásquez Palma, María Fernanda. 2011. Arbitraje en Chile. Legal Publishing, 2° Edición, Chile. pp: 567-571.

Disposiciones legales

Ley N° 1.525, que aprueba el Código de Procedimiento Civil, publicada en el Diario Oficial, 30 de agosto de 1902.

Ley N° 7.421, que aprueba el Código Orgánico de Tribunales, publicada en el Diario Oficial, 09 de julio de 1943.

Ley N° 20.017, que modifica el Código de Aguas, publicada en el Diario Oficial, 16 de junio de 2005.

Ley N° 20.730, que modifica el Código Penal, publicada en el Diario Oficial, 08 de marzo de 2014.

Decreto con Fuerza de Ley N° 1.122, que fija el texto del Código de Aguas, publicado en el Diario Oficial, 29 de octubre de 1981.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-30

How to Cite

Castro-Portales, D., & Moraga-Navarro, M. P. (2015). Conflict resolution inside water users’ organizations in Chile: judicialization or arbitration?. Agricultura, Sociedad Y Desarrollo, 12(3), 319–347. https://doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v12i3.233

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2015): Agricultura Sociedad y Desarrollo

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Diego Castro-Portales

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:

 

  1. The authors retain the copyright and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this magazine.
  2. Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work It was first published in this magazine.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and greater and faster dissemination of the work. published (see The Effect of Open Access).