Factors that influence the adoption of innovations by orange producers in álamo, Veracruz
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v16i2.1006Keywords:
adoption of innovations, technology transference, incomeAbstract
In Veracruz, the yields per surface unit have been practically stable for more than 34 years and when the factors that influence this were determined, it was found that a deficient adoption of innovations is the most important issue. With the aim of improving this adoption, an initial baseline survey was applied to 100 citrus producers from ten localities. Later, integral extension work was provided for one year through the use of monitoring logbooks and at the end, the final baseline survey was applied. An increase of 30.5 % in average was attained in the adoption of technological innovations, since fertilization and control of pests and diseases were improved. To determine the factors that influence the adoption of innovations, simple regression models were generated, using as dependent variable the increase in the innovation adoption index and as independent variables the specific attributes of the producer and his production units. The factor that had significant correlation with the innovation adoption index was the income of the producer. Factors such as age, years of experience and schooling did not influence decision making for the adoption of technologies.References
Allub L., 2001. Aversión al riesgo y adopción de innovaciones tecnológicas en pequeños productores rurales de zonas áridas: Un enfoque causal, Estudios Sociológicos, vol. XIX, núm. 2, mayo-agosto, 2001, El Colegio de México, México. pp: 467-493.
Almaguer V., G., y Ayala G. A. V. 2014. Adopción de innovaciones en limón ‘Persa’ (Citrus latifolia Tan.) In: Tlapacoyan, Veracruz. Uso de bitácora. Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura, 20(1), 89-100.
Binswanger, H. P., and D. A. Sillers. 1983: Risk Aversion and Credit Constraints in Farmers’ Decision-Making: AR e interpretation, Journal of Development Studies, 20, 5-21.
Bozoinn, M., y Ceyhan, V. 2007. Measuring the technical efficiency and exploring the inefficiency determinants of vegetable farms in Samsun province, Turkey. Agricultural Systems 94 (3): 649-656.
Cáceres D. 1994. Estrategias Campesinas y Riesgo. Desarrollo Agroforestal y Comunidad Campesina, 3(13). pp: 2-6.
Contreras-C., J. M. 2000. La competitividad de las exportaciones mexicanas de aguacate: un análisis cuantitativo. Centro de Investigaciones Económicas, Sociales y Tecnológicas de la Agroindustria y la Agricultura Mundial (CIESTAM). Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (UACh). Reportes de investigación Núm. 46. México, D. F. 42 p.
COVECA. 2002. Diagnóstico de la cadena de naranja en el estado de Veracruz, Gobierno del estado de Veracruz.
Cuevas R. V., Baca M., Julio, Cervantes E, F., Espinosa G., J. A., Aguilar Ã. J., y Loaiza M. A. 2013. Factores que determinan el uso de innovaciones tecnológicas en la ganadería de doble propósito en Sinaloa, México. Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias, 4(1), 31-46.
Recuperado en 21 de julio de 2016, de http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-
&lng=es&tlng=es.
Feder, G. and O’Mara, G. T. 1982. On information and innovation diffusion: a Bayesian approach, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64, 145-147.
Feder, G., R.E. Just, and D. Zilberman. 1985. Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change 33(2):255–98.
Galindo G., G. 1992. Aspectos relacionados con la comunicación agropecuaria entre ejidatarios del Mezquite, Zacatecas. Fitotecnia Mexicana 15: 193-196.
Galindo G., G. 1995. Uso de innovaciones agrícolas en la región central de Zacatecas, México. Fitotecnia Mexicana 18: 140-150.
García S., E. I.; Aguilar Ã., J. y Bernal M., R. (2011). La agricultura protegida en Tlaxcala, Méjico: La adopción de innovaciones y el nivel de equipamiento como factores para su categorización. Teuken Bidikay, (No. 2): 193-212.
Hartwich, F.; Monge P., M., Ampuero R, L. y Soto, J. L. 2007. Knowledge management for agricultural innovation: lessons from networking efforts in the Bolivian Agricultural Technology System. In: Knowledge Management for Development Journal, vol. 3 (No. 2): 21-37.
INEGI. 2009. Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática. Censo Nacional Agropecuario y Pesquero. 2007. Aguascalientes, Ags. México.
Jasso V., J. 2005. La dimensión evolutiva de la innovación: un rumbo necesario de la política científica, tecnológica y de innovación. In: Economía y Sociedad, 10(15): 99-119.
Lipton, M. 1968. The theory of the optimising peasant. Journal of Development Studies 4(3), 327-351.
Muñoz R., M., Aguilar Ã., J. Rendón M. R., y Altamirano C., J. R. 2007. Análisis de la dinámica de innovación en cadenas agroalimentarias. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo – CIESTAAM / PIIAI. Chapingo, México. 72 p.
Paz, A., Montoya M. P., y Asensio H. R 2013. Escalando innovaciones rurales. Asensio. Lima, IEP; IDRC-CRDI; FIDA, 2013. (Estudios de la Sociedad Rural, 43).
Reimers, M., and Klasen S. 2013. Revisiting the role of education for agricultural productivity. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 95(1):131-152.
Rogers, Everret. 2003. Difussion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York, USA: The Free Press.
SIACON-SAGARPA (Sistema de información agroalimentaria de consulta. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación). 2015. Sistema de información agroalimentaria de consulta. México, D. F.
Venezian, E., and Gamble W. 1969. The Agricultural Development of Mexico. Its Structure and Growth Since 1950. Praeger. New York, USA. 305 p.
Zarazúa, J. A., Solleiro, J. L., Altamirano R., Castañón R., y Rendón R. 2009. Esquemas de innovación tecnológica y su transferencia en las agroempresas frutícolas del estado de Michoacán. Revista Estudios Sociales 17(34): 37-71.
Zarazúa E. J. A., G. Almaguer V., y S. R. Márquez B. 2011. Redes de innovación en el sistema productivo fresa en Zamora, Michoacán. Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura 17: 51-60.
Zarazúa, J.A., Almaguer V.G., y Rendón M.R. 2012. Capital Social. Caso red de innovación de maíz en Zamora Michoacán, México. Cuadernos de desarrollo rural, 9 (68): 105-124.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- The authors retain the copyright and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this magazine.
- Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work It was first published in this magazine.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and greater and faster dissemination of the work. published (see The Effect of Open Access).








